Civil, criminal and class action. The structure of a matter, who stands behind whom, what each statement commits them to and where the conflicts actually sit, is the thing that decides it. It arrives as documents, and documents do not hold a shape.
Round Table is an operational ontology engine. The model is enforced, every consequential act is attributed and hash-linked, and the record can be checked by a third party without trusting the vendor. Machine ingestion proposes. People decide.
Written for litigation partners running multi-party civil, criminal and class action matters.
A matter does not begin with the documents. It begins with the structure around the parties, which is reachable from public sources before a single interview is scheduled.
Every consequential public statement becomes a typed claim with a source and a date, so the parties whose position already aligns with yours are found rather than guessed at.
Collection without structure is a pile. Each document enters as claims that connect, and the library says plainly what it does and does not cover.
A conflict is a path between two parties, not a name on a list. The pack shows a real query result against an illustrative graph.
Fifteen pages, written for litigation partners. Sent on request, not published.